IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/pshchp/978-3-030-42925-6_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Bentham and Ricardo’s Rendez-vous Manqués

In: New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History

Author

Listed:
  • Christophe Depoortère

    (CEMOI, University of Reunion Island)

  • André Lapidus

    (PHARE, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

  • Nathalie Sigot

    (PHARE, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the possible influence of Bentham on Ricardo’s economics through three rendez-vous. The first one was mediated by James Mill: we show that (i) if Mill ever had an influence on Ricardo early in their relationship, he was not yet Benthamian, and (ii) if this influence was to come later, Ricardo’s comments prove that he was unconvinced by Mill’s description of how people act. The second rendez-vous manqué resulted from Ricardo’s reading of Bentham’s Sur les prix: this reading could not have influenced Ricardo’s monetary thought, because (i) it occurred after Ricardo’s first monetary publications, and (ii) it led Ricardo to disagree with Bentham’s monetary analysis. The last rendez-vous was also manqué. Bentham blamed Ricardo for confusing ‘cost’ with ‘value’ in his Essay on Profits, but this reflects diverging approaches between the two authors. Accordingly, the assumption of Bentham’s influence on Ricardo’s economics seems hardly defendable.

Suggested Citation

  • Christophe Depoortère & André Lapidus & Nathalie Sigot, 2020. "Bentham and Ricardo’s Rendez-vous Manqués," Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought, in: Maria Cristina Marcuzzo & Ghislain Deleplace & Paolo Paesani (ed.), New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History, chapter 0, pages 195-216, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:pshchp:978-3-030-42925-6_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42925-6_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:pshchp:978-3-030-42925-6_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.