IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/pmschp/978-3-319-30819-7_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Liquidity Mismatch, Bank Borrowing Decision and Distress: Empirical Evidence from Italian Credit Co-Operative Banks

In: Liquidity Risk, Efficiency and New Bank Business Models

Author

Listed:
  • Gianfranco Vento

    (Guglielmo Marconi University in Rome)

  • Andrea Pezzotta

    (Federcasse)

  • Stefano Colli

    (Federcasse)

Abstract

Since the 2007–2008 financial crisis liquidity risk has become one of the top priorities for regulators and new liquidity requirements have been introduced. Despite the importance of liquidity risk and the progress in addressing it there is no consensus about how to measure it and how to do so in a such a way as to provide information about (endogenous) systemic liquidity risk. This work aims to implement the “Liquidity Mismatch Index” proposed by Brunnermeier et al. (2011) to measure the mismatch between market liquidity of assets and the funding liabilities, using a sample of Italian co-operative banks. It investigates the main determinants of this mismatch, how it correlates with other bank characteristics and whether it provides useful information about borrowing decisions and distress of banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianfranco Vento & Andrea Pezzotta & Stefano Colli, 2016. "Liquidity Mismatch, Bank Borrowing Decision and Distress: Empirical Evidence from Italian Credit Co-Operative Banks," Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions, in: Santiago Carbó Valverde & Pedro Jesús Cuadros Solas & Francisco Rodríguez Fernández (ed.), Liquidity Risk, Efficiency and New Bank Business Models, chapter 10, pages 273-299, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:pmschp:978-3-319-30819-7_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-30819-7_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hou, Xiaohui & Yang, Rui, 2024. "Bank digital transformation and liquidity mismatch: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 581-597.
    2. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù, 2019. "Liquidity Risk Drivers and Bank Business Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:pmschp:978-3-319-30819-7_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.