Author
Listed:
- Margaret P. Doxey
(Trent University)
Abstract
Over the past decade, international sanctions have featured prominently in state practice. Not surprisingly they have also received considerable attention in the news media, in public debate and in scholarly writing.1 A series of high-profile cases of sanctioning outside the United Nations framework began in late 1979 with the response to the Tehran hostages crisis and the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan; sanctions were also imposed following the introduction of martial law in Poland in 1981, in the Falklands war in 1982, and against Libya in 1986. In all of these cases, with the exception of the Falklands war, the United States was the initiator and main proponent of collective measures. Sanctions ordered by the UN Security Council on Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) were formally lifted in December 1979 in the wake of a settlement providing for full independence with majority rule, but discussion and debate continued with intermittent vigour in the UN and other international forums on the pros and cons of applying economic sanctions to South Africa. The institutionalised system of racial discrimination (apartheid) which denies political rights to South African blacks, as well as South Africa’s continued administration of Namibia in defiance of UN and World Court rulings, provide moral and legal grounds for sanctions in this case. A mandatory embargo on arms sales to South Africa was imposed by the Security Council in 1977 and in 1985 unprecedented and sustained levels of internal unrest in South African black townships, accompanied by renewed repression by the authorities, brought widespread calls for stronger measures to which western governments proved more responsive than in the past. In July the Security Council encouraged UN members to adopt voluntary sanctions and in September the United States, European Community members and other western governments took some action on this recommendation. In October Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in the Bahamas agreed on a set of mild penalties with a commitment to review the situation in six months’ time. In the long run it is not impossible that mandatory economic sanctions may be imposed against South Africa.
Suggested Citation
Margaret P. Doxey, 1987.
"The Scope of the Study,"
Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: International Sanctions in Contemporary Perspective, chapter 1, pages 1-12,
Palgrave Macmillan.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-18750-8_1
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-18750-8_1
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-18750-8_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.