IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-349-07743-4_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Conclusion

In: Economic Exiles

Author

Listed:
  • J. E. King

    (University of Lancaster)

Abstract

In the opening chapter it was suggested that economic heresy can be interpreted as deviant science. The literature on the sociology of science yielded a number of hypotheses concerning both resistance to unorthodox ideas and those occasions on which mainstream economists became more receptive to dissident arguments. Heretics might be opposed on grounds of scientific rigour, their arguments being seen as incoherent, unclear, or irrelevant to the tasks at hand. Considerations of professional pride might be involved, both in the cases of ‘trespassers’ from another scientific discipline and where untrained amateurs are involved. Intellectual conservatism may predispose the practitioners of Kuhnian ‘normal science’ to resist innovation, and to do so more vigorously the greater the depth and breadth of the challenge to existing orthodoxy. Finally, political motives might operate if new ideas were seen to threaten existing power structures and vested (especially class) interests.

Suggested Citation

  • J. E. King, 1988. "Conclusion," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Economic Exiles, chapter 11, pages 234-242, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-07743-4_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-07743-4_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-07743-4_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.