IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-349-05084-0_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Commodity Agreements under a Quasi-United Nations System

In: Law and Diplomacy in Commodity Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Emiko Atimomo

Abstract

Attempts at negotiating an international cocoa agreement with the consumers started as early as 1957 and for about fifteen years no success was registered. The difficulties lay not only in the erratic nature of the cocoa market, in that it is very speculative, but also in the fact that the negotiating parties have always found it difficult to strike at an acceptable price range and the functioning principles of the buffer stock. The fall in prices in 1970/71 cocoa year could be attributed to the fact that there were expectations in many market circles that the 1970/71 cocoa production would be higher than the estimated consumption for 1971. Hypothetically, cocoa production was expected to be 1,720,000 metric tons if world estimated stocks, at approximately 256,000 tons, were added to 1,464,000 tons when the estimates of consumption were put at 1,418,000 tons. From 1965 to 1970 market prices were relatively high because consumer demands were higher than production. But between 1970 and 1971 there was a sudden fall in prices within six months from £360 sterling per ton in September 1970, to £230 per ton in March 1971 (see Table 11.1), this being the sharpest drop in recent years. Another notable period of price degradation was during the 1964–65 season when world production was at 1.5 million tons.

Suggested Citation

  • Emiko Atimomo, 1981. "Commodity Agreements under a Quasi-United Nations System," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Law and Diplomacy in Commodity Economics, chapter 11, pages 309-322, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-05084-0_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-05084-0_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-05084-0_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.