IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-349-03946-3_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Postscript and Some Conclusions

In: Industrial Relations in the Coal Industry

Author

Listed:
  • B. J. McCormick

Abstract

In November 1977 the miners rejected a proposal for a productivity bonus scheme by 55.75 per cent to 44.25 per cent. The scheme would have led to the establishment of norms by method study for coalfaces and the incentive bonus would have been based on individual faces or the average for all faces in a pit. Haulage and surfaceworkers would have received their bonuses on the basis of productivity in their pits and workers at workshops, area and national levels would have obtained a bonus based upon the appropriate geographical unit. Following the ballot Joe Gormley, the NUM president, announced that he would never again attempt to introduce a national productivity bonus scheme. In December, however, the NEC voted to allow Areas to introduce schemes. The NEC decision caused considerable furore and controversy because it seemed to flaunt the verdict of the pit-head ballot. The militant coalfields of Kent, South Wales, Scotland and Yorkshire attempted to obtain an injunction restraining the NEC but it failed. Through December 1977 and January 1978 the various coalfields voted to accept productivity schemes. Despite their massive votes against bonuses Yorkshire, Scotland and South Wales succumbed to internal pressures from workers at highly productive pits and to the pressure of comparisons with the benefits being received by miners in neighbouring coalfields. The volte face of December 1977 represented a triumph for the right wing and created considerably disunity within the NUM.

Suggested Citation

  • B. J. McCormick, 1979. "A Postscript and Some Conclusions," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Industrial Relations in the Coal Industry, chapter 7, pages 227-232, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-03946-3_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-03946-3_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-03946-3_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.