IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-137-44352-6_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Appraisal of ICT and Non-ICT Projects: A Study of Practices of Large UK Organisations

In: The FAP Model and Its Application in the Appraisal of ICT Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Lefley

    (University of Hradec Králové)

Abstract

As companies become more and more reliant on ICT systems to aid good decision-making, a regular review of their information technology requirements is inevitable. The appraisal of such investments is not, however, without its problems.1 Arguments have been raised that the traditional methods of financial appraisal are inadequate because ICT investments differ, in many respects, from non-ICT capital investments.2 The literature shows that some companies now tend to use a greater number of appraisal techniques than in the past, but there is no consensus on the actual combination.3 The literature also shows that individual appraisal models on their own are now inappropriate and a more hybrid approach is required, one that includes both economic and strategic dimensions of choice.4 As a result of the perceived failure of some of the traditional methods of capital investment appraisal, managers sometimes base their decisions on ‘acts of faith’ or, as some researchers report, use less sophisticated financial models to evaluate what must be regarded as sophisticated IT projects.5 It is argued that the positivist approach to the evaluation of IT projects that places excessive emphasis on accounting aspects may no longer be relevant and that a more ‘interpretive’ approach should be adopted.6 Sophisticated investments, such as investments in ICT, may require a more sophisticated approach in their appraisal, with the use of a larger diversity of financial, risk, and strategic assessment models.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Lefley, 2015. "The Appraisal of ICT and Non-ICT Projects: A Study of Practices of Large UK Organisations," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The FAP Model and Its Application in the Appraisal of ICT Projects, chapter 3, pages 34-67, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-44352-6_3
    DOI: 10.1057/9781137443526_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-44352-6_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.