IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-137-26363-6_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The City of London, British Ethnic and National Identities, and Investment Decisions in the Anglophone New World, 1860–1914

In: Comparative Responses to Globalization

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Smith

Abstract

The British experience of globalization was fundamentally different from that of Japan. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, Britain created a global trading network, whereas Japan isolated itself from the world. By the nineteenth century, London was the world’s financial capital. Moreover, British people established overseas settlements that later helped to make English the language of global business. Another outcome of British colonization was that the legal systems of the United States and the British Dominions were derived from that of England and Wales. Law and finance economists such as Rafael La Porta and his colleagues regard Anglo-American common law as the legal tradition most conducive to the development of capital markets.1 By spreading English common law throughout the world, British colonization also helped to lay the foundations of the Anglo-Saxon model of capitalism, which closely resembles the liberal market economy identified by Peter A. Hall and David Soskice.2 Even in the twenty-first century, Britain’s linguistic and cultural ties to the New World continue to facilitate its international trade. Japan opened up to the world economy only in the middle of the nineteenth century and its efforts to establish Japanese colonies overseas came to an abrupt end in 1945. Japan’s failure to create any daughter nations overseas or to make its language the lingua franca of global commerce has made that country’s experience of globalization fundamentally different from that of Britain.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Smith, 2013. "The City of London, British Ethnic and National Identities, and Investment Decisions in the Anglophone New World, 1860–1914," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Maki Umemura & Rika Fujioka (ed.), Comparative Responses to Globalization, chapter 4, pages 71-98, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-26363-6_4
    DOI: 10.1057/9781137263636_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-26363-6_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.