IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-137-03530-1_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Social Enterprises and Social Categories

In: Social Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Galaskiewicz
  • Sondra N. Barringer

Abstract

The discussion of what makes nonprofits and for-profits different from one another is still relevant. Research has touched upon the role of the non-distribution constraint (Hansmann, 1980), values or preferences of leaders (Weisbrod, 1998a), funding streams (Frumkin and Galaskiewicz, 2004) and legal status (Stark, 2010). There is usually the assumption that the identities of the organizations under study are unambiguous and their forms distinct.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Galaskiewicz & Sondra N. Barringer, 2012. "Social Enterprises and Social Categories," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Benjamin Gidron & Yeheskel Hasenfeld (ed.), Social Enterprises, chapter 2, pages 47-70, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-03530-1_3
    DOI: 10.1057/9781137035301_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ji-Hoon Park & Zong-Tae Bae, 2020. "Legitimation of Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Zhang, Yaomin & Pinkse, Jonatan & McMeekin, Andrew, 2020. "The governance practices of sharing platforms: Unpacking the interplay between social bonds and economic transactions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Charles Amoyea Atogenzoya & Anna Comacchio, 2019. "Nature and Management of Social-business Tensions: A Study of Micro and Small Social Enterprises in Developing Countries," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 8612069, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    4. Irina I. Krasnopolskaya, 2014. "Corporate Volunteering And Its Influence On Employee Civil Engagement In Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 39/SOC/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    5. Stefan Dimitriadis & Matthew Lee & Lakshmi Ramarajan & Julie Battilana, 2017. "Blurring the Boundaries: The Interplay of Gender and Local Communities in the Commercialization of Social Ventures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 819-839, October.
    6. Roman N. Abramov, 2014. "The History Of Sociological Research On Occupations And Professions In The Ussr 1960-80s: Ideological Frameworks And Analytical Resources," HSE Working papers WP BRP 40/SOC/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Kevin Levillain & Blanche Segrestin & Armand Hatchuel, 2015. "Is Law Normalizing Hybrid Organizations? Guidelines from Multi-purpose Corporations," Post-Print hal-01143317, HAL.
    8. Jin Byungchae, 2020. "The Practical Intelligence of Social Entrepreneurs: Managing the Hybridity of Social Enterprises," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Michael Chak Sham Wong & Richard Chin Yee Yap, 2019. "Social Impact Investing for Marginalized Communities in Hong Kong: Cases and Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Lall, Saurabh Ajay, 2017. "Measuring to Improve Versus Measuring to Prove: Understanding the Adoption of Social Performance Measurement Practices in Nascent Social Enterprises," SocArXiv 8wa5c, Center for Open Science.
    11. Matthew Lee & Laura Huang, 2018. "Gender Bias, Social Impact Framing, and Evaluation of Entrepreneurial Ventures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Matthew Lee & Julie Battilana, 2013. "How the Zebra Got Its Stripes: Imprinting of Individuals and Hybrid Social Ventures," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-005, Harvard Business School.
    13. Kevin Levillain & Blanche Segrestin & Armand Hatchuel, 2017. "Is law normalizing Hybrid Organizations? Putting profit-with-purpose corporations into historical perspective," Post-Print hal-01497085, HAL.
    14. Matthew Lee & Arzi Adbi & Jasjit Singh, 2020. "Categorical cognition and outcome efficiency in impact investing decisions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 86-107, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-03530-1_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.