IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-333-98317-1_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Have the Poor Benefited? Evidence on Effectiveness and Impact

In: European Development Cooperation and the Poor

Author

Listed:
  • Aidan Cox

    (UNDP)

  • John Healey

    (Overseas Development Institute)

  • Paul Hoebink

    (Catholic University)

  • Timo Voipio

    (IDS)

Abstract

There is surprisingly little evidence available to indicate the type and extent of the impact of donor-funded interventions on the poor. First, most monitoring and evaluation reports tend to concentrate on physical outputs or on management processes rather than on the actual impact on beneficiaries. To assess impact would require the use of more sophisticated techniques and would cost more. Baseline surveys, which are very rarely conducted, would be needed, as well as the use of ‘control groups’ to compare the well-being of people in ‘with-project’ areas with non-benefiting areas, for instance. Also, only a small minority of interventions have been evaluated, thus sharply reducing the information base available to assess the benefits flowing to the poor. Finally, when monitoring and evaluation studies were carried out, they usually made little attempt to disaggregate impact, or even access to outputs, by socioeconomic group. Although they may be a useful source of information on general implementation effectiveness, they are unsatisfactory guides to the impact on poor groups in particular.

Suggested Citation

  • Aidan Cox & John Healey & Paul Hoebink & Timo Voipio, 2000. "Have the Poor Benefited? Evidence on Effectiveness and Impact," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: European Development Cooperation and the Poor, chapter 5, pages 78-92, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-333-98317-1_5
    DOI: 10.1057/9780333983171_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-333-98317-1_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.