IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-230-62752-9_18.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Responsible Leadership Ethics

In: Diversity

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt April
  • Amanda April

Abstract

Getting to grips with the dualistic nature of an emerging, unified Europe is very necessary for incumbent and emerging leaders where, for instance, for the most part Western European countries and companies have opted to either implement the minimum requirements, normally driven through law and legislation in its companies and societies, e.g., implement demographic targets to be achieved, or focused narrowly on context-relevant multi-culturalism. Contrasting with this approach are the newer EU members, like Baltic-located Estonia, for which diversity is a very new concept, and countries on the periphery, like Turkey, for which the concept of the individual is a blurry, changeable one due largely to their experience of heightened individualism as well as communalism throughout their long political and economic history, and finally countries like Romania which are caught in a time-warp of biculturality as they rediscover their historical economic prowess. The fundamental flaw, as we see it, is that too much of the focus has been on how to efficiently box people into certain categories, typically geographic cultural ones, and then seek to lead them through those lenses — as opposed to fully embracing the uncertainty of diversity. In a changing Europe, diversity is an ethical issue, for which leaders have a clear responsibility, if they hope to build a sustainable Europe that works for all — oneself and others. In many ways, the unwillingness by some leaders in Europe — community, organisational and institutional/governmental — to fully engage such discourse and deconstruction is a moral injustice, and erodes the precepts of a free and democratic EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt April & Amanda April, 2007. "Responsible Leadership Ethics," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Kurt A. April & Marylou L. Shockley (ed.), Diversity, chapter 17, pages 276-293, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-62752-9_18
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230627529_18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-62752-9_18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.