IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-230-59590-3_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Opinion on the Study

In: Dennis Robertson

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon Fletcher

    (University of Liverpool Management School)

Abstract

In Chapter 2 we saw that Robertson’s first major work, A Study of Industrial Fluctuation (1915), drew on historical evidence and on continental theory to produce an explanation of the trade cycle that represented a significant departure from previous thinking in Britain. What follows is a survey of opinion on the Study as expressed by commentators over the years. There was general recognition that it represented a tremendous personal achievement for Robertson and that it gave ample testimony of his intellectual precocity. It was also given credit for introducing ideas which were unfamiliar in Britain and for drawing its authority from an appeal to the facts. Beyond that, however, views as to its precise contribution and as to the validity of its conclusions differed widely. To put the various comments in a suitable context, we begin with a fuller account of Robertson’s theory of the cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon Fletcher, 2006. "Opinion on the Study," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Dennis Robertson, chapter 4, pages 45-70, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-59590-3_5
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230595903_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-59590-3_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.