IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-230-59282-7_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Organization and Subjectivity in the US Medical Profession: Physician Responses to Structural Changes within Advanced Capitalism

In: Redirections in the Study of Expert Labour

Author

Listed:
  • Theresa A. Domagalski

Abstract

The medical profession in the United States has had a long history of privilege and status. Throughout much of the 20th century, physicians possessed a distinctive advantage in relation to other occupational groups within the economy for their ability to sustain a monopolistic influence over healthcare practices and policy. Control over the technical core of medicine, the capacity to tightly regulate entry into the profession, and the achievement of autonomy in the production of medical services led to the recognition of medicine as the quintessential profession (e.g. Freidson, 1970, 1980, 1994). In recent years, however, the medical profession in the US has experienced a downward shift in its dominant position. The reasons for this change have been the subject of considerable debate and speculation (Anderson, 1992; Hafferty and Light, 1995; Scott et al., 2000; Schlesinger, 2002) as have the interpretive schema used to explain its current status (Haug, 1973, 1975; Derber, 1983; McKinlay and Arches, 1985; Light and Levine, 1988; Derber et al., 1990; Hafferty and Wolinksy, 1991; McKinlay and Marceau, 2002).

Suggested Citation

  • Theresa A. Domagalski, 2008. "Organization and Subjectivity in the US Medical Profession: Physician Responses to Structural Changes within Advanced Capitalism," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Daniel Muzio & Stephen Ackroyd & Jean-François Chanlat (ed.), Redirections in the Study of Expert Labour, chapter 6, pages 118-138, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-59282-7_6
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230592827_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-59282-7_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.