IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-230-50427-1_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Financial Reorganisation

In: The Development Business

Author

Listed:
  • Michael McWilliam

Abstract

The litmus tests for CDC’s survival were threefold. First, it had to demonstrate business competence in a notably hazardous area of endeavour. As we have seen, operating profits were being earned by 1955 and a reputation for competence was on the way to being established. Second, it had to secure a mandate to develop its business, against the grain of Conservative political philosophy. The struggles over the area of permitted operations, of lending to government entities, over alternative finance and the creation of CDFC, were evidence of the real threats to CDC’s role as a development institution. The third test related to whether government would accept the need for CDC to wipe out the consequences of its earlier mistakes, through a reorganisation of its balance sheet, so that its continuing development role was not crippled by having to service and repay lost capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael McWilliam, 2001. "Financial Reorganisation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Development Business, chapter 5, pages 54-62, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-50427-1_5
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230504271_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-50427-1_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.