IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-230-37437-9_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Contributions and Controversies, 1922 to 1990

In: Oxford Economics and Oxford Economists

Author

Listed:
  • Warren Young

    (Deakin University)

  • Frederic S. Lee

    (De Montfort University)

Abstract

The contributions of the generations of Oxford economists of the prewar (1922 to 1939), wartime (1940 to 1945), and post-war (1946 onwards) periods were significant, highly original and many times critical of neoclassical theory. And, as in the case of such work, these contributions were accompanied by debate both within the economics profession and amongst Oxford economists themselves. In order to do justice to the overall scope of Oxford economics during these periods, we will not limit ourselves only to the contributions that engendered critical debate among ‘mainstream’ economists. Indeed, some of the most interesting and thought-provoking work at Oxford also took place in what can be called the ‘non-mainstream’ and ‘heterodox’ areas of economic inquiry, conducted by individuals who ranged from formally-trained or self-taught economists, in most cases, to in one instance at least, an influential — albeit somewhat forgotten — ‘monetary crank’. This demarcation follows from the eclectic and path-breaking tradition that characterised Oxford economics and economists of these periods. Indeed, even up to the time of his death, Hicks was working on what he called a new approach to markets and money. Thus Sayers’s comment on the interwar Oxford economists is also appropriate for the Oxford economists of the post-war era as well: In the second of the inter-war decades Oxford had at least its fair share of the rising generation of English economists … These economists in no sense formed a ‘school of thought:’ they were drawn from surprisingly varied sources and had scarcely had time to do more than understand and explain work originating in the older homes of economic thought. But to suppose that they were content to find illumination in traditional doctrine would be a grave injustice: they were also keenly interested in putting traditional doctrine to the test of practical experience and in arriving at practical maxims for economic policy.1

Suggested Citation

  • Warren Young & Frederic S. Lee, 1993. "Contributions and Controversies, 1922 to 1990," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Oxford Economics and Oxford Economists, chapter 8, pages 186-208, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-37437-9_9
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230374379_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-37437-9_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.