IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-230-30689-9_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Augmented Scenario Approaches: Delving Deeper and Stretching Wider

In: Scenario Thinking

Author

Listed:
  • George Wright

    (Durham Business School)

  • George Cairns

    (RMIT University)

Abstract

In this chapter, we set out the various stages and options for undertaking two augmented and more highly-developed scenario approaches. These are not stand-alone approaches, in that they each relate to and build upon the basic method outlined in Chapter 2. As such, they must be read in conjunction with Chapter 2 for implementation purposes, and only after Chapter 2 in terms of developing your overall understanding of scenario method. Additionally, the two approaches outlined do not stand apart from each other. They can each be implemented separately as extensions of the basic method, or they can be combined with each other and the basic method in order to bring both greater depth of understanding of the content that informs the analytic process, and greater breadth to consideration of the impacts of driving forces and events across human society and the natural environment over time. The second augmentation, which brings in consideration of “broad” stakeholder analysis (Freeman and Reed, 1983), demonstrates application of the “critical scenario method” (CSM) approach that we introduced in Chapter 4.

Suggested Citation

  • George Wright & George Cairns, 2011. "Augmented Scenario Approaches: Delving Deeper and Stretching Wider," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Scenario Thinking, chapter 0, pages 83-102, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-30689-9_5
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230306899_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ayedh Almutairi & John P. Wheeler & David L. Slutzky & James H. Lambert, 2019. "Integrating Stakeholder Mapping and Risk Scenarios to Improve Resilience of Cyber‐Physical‐Social Networks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 2093-2112, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-30689-9_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.