IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-230-30411-6_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

On Reform of Hong Kong’s Public Research Funding System

In: Innovation Policy and the Limits of Laissez-faire

Author

Listed:
  • Chintay Shih

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Shin-Horng Chen

    (Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research)

Abstract

The Hong Kong government used to adopt a laissez-faire policy to promote economic development in Hong Kong, but since 1997 promotion of R&D and innovation has been given high priority on the policy agenda (ITC, 2004; Liu, 2008). In order to come to terms with the rising economic strength of Mainland China, some in Hong Kong, from both the private and public sectors, feel that Hong Kong needs to develop its own innovation and technology capabilities in a few fields in order to become an “innovation hub” in the region (Baark and Sharif, 2006; Hills et al., 2004; Sharif and Baark, 2008). In so doing, Hong Kong may be able to capitalise on the manufacturing muscle in the Mainland, the Pearl River Delta (PRD) in particular.

Suggested Citation

  • Chintay Shih & Shin-Horng Chen, 2010. "On Reform of Hong Kong’s Public Research Funding System," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Douglas B. Fuller (ed.), Innovation Policy and the Limits of Laissez-faire, chapter 5, pages 114-144, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-30411-6_6
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230304116_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoke Zhang, 2020. "The institutional structuring of innovation policy coordination: theory and evidence from East Asia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(1), pages 101-138, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-30411-6_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.