IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/intecp/978-1-349-16394-6_24.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Discussion of Dr Pryke’s Paper

In: Public and Private Enterprise in a Mixed Economy

Author

Listed:
  • William J. Baumol

Abstract

Dr Pryke, in his opening remarks, offered a set of five hypotheses that he had inferred from his investigations: (1) Nationalised industries did relatively worse than private industries when the economy performed badly because (a) union resistance to the dismissal of workers was stronger than in private industry, (b) politicians did not want to create unemployment, because of short-term considerations, (c) there was a temptation for ad hoc intervention, and (d) price restraints upon public enterprises designed to reduce inflation led to losses. (2) Unconditional subsidies led to loss of control over costs and tended to escalate. (3) Nationalised industries should be expected to cover their own costs. Problems of inequality should be tackled by other means, such as taxation and redistribution. (4) New devices were needed to increase productivity in public enterprises — means such as productivity targets and five-yearly efficiency audits. (5) Monopolies should be avoided where possible. If a nationalised industry was in competition with private industry, the government could let it contract if it did not improve its efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • William J. Baumol, 1980. "Discussion of Dr Pryke’s Paper," International Economic Association Series, in: William J. Baumol (ed.), Public and Private Enterprise in a Mixed Economy, pages 230-232, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:intecp:978-1-349-16394-6_24
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-16394-6_24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:intecp:978-1-349-16394-6_24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.