IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/11704.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Bayesian Decision Theory and the Simplification of Models

In: Evaluation of Econometric Models

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph B. Kadane
  • James M. Dickey

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph B. Kadane & James M. Dickey, 1980. "Bayesian Decision Theory and the Simplification of Models," NBER Chapters, in: Evaluation of Econometric Models, pages 245-268, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:11704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c11704.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Tiao & B. Afonja, 1976. "Some bayesian considerations of the choice of design for ranking, selection and estimation," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 28(1), pages 167-185, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brock,W.A. & Durlauf,S.N., 2000. "Growth economics and reality," Working papers 24, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    2. Luc Anselin, 1988. "Model Validation in Spatial Econometrics: A Review and Evaluation of Alternative Approaches," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 11(3), pages 279-316, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Júlio S. de S. Bueno Filho & Steven G. Gilmour, 2003. "Planning Incomplete Block Experiments When Treatments Are Genetically Related," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 375-381, June.
    2. Peter I. Frazier & Warren B. Powell, 2010. "Paradoxes in Learning and the Marginal Value of Information," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 378-403, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:11704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.