IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/fpr/ifpric/9780896293809_03.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Farm machinery use and the agricultural machinery industries in India: Status, evolution, implications, and lessons learned

In: An evolving paradigm of agricultural mechanization development: How much can Africa learn from Asia?

Author

Listed:
  • Bhattarai, Madhusudan
  • Singh, Gajendra
  • Takeshima, Hiroyuki
  • Shekhawat, Ravindra S.

Abstract

Over the last several decades, India has seen a continuous spread of tractor use as well as growth in its domestic tractor manufacturing industry, despite relatively slow wage growth and a slow decline in the employment share of the agricultural sector. By now, arguably as much as 90 percent of the country’s farm area may be prepared by tractors. India is now the largest tractor market in the world, purchasing more than 90 percent of the 660,000 tractors it produces per year. The annual value of tractors sold in India is more than US$5 billion per year. This study reviews the evolution of agricultural mechanization, particularly tractors, in India. In doing so, it provides some rough indicators of the extent of mechanization (particularly the spread of tractor use) at different historical phases, emphasizing that India’s experiences up to 1990 are as important as the lessons since then. Substantial infrastructure endowments (in terms of roads, for example), which were already high in the 1960s, and investments into rural electrification, as well as knowledge accumulation through the importation of a large number of tractors early on, are likely to have helped the growth of domestic tractor manufacturing. Diverse custom hiring services for tractors and combine harvesters have emerged to serve areas that are profitable, with relatively little direct support from the government. The private sector has also stepped up to provide facilitating services to connect service providers and farmers. Empirical analyses of the impact of tractor ownership and tractor/combine harvester use confirms many hypotheses about the farm-level impact of mechanization in India. Despite the typically small landholding in India, tractor ownership is led by the motive to expand farm size. Tractors are more bullock saving than labor saving, whereas combine harvesters are more strongly labor saving. Combine harvesters are more yield enhancing than tractors, but land preparation by tractors may indirectly enhance yields through the increased use of chemical fertilizer.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhattarai, Madhusudan & Singh, Gajendra & Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Shekhawat, Ravindra S., 2020. "Farm machinery use and the agricultural machinery industries in India: Status, evolution, implications, and lessons learned," IFPRI book chapters, in: An evolving paradigm of agricultural mechanization development: How much can Africa learn from Asia?, chapter 3, pages 97-138, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifpric:9780896293809_03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifpri.org/cdmref/p15738coll2/id/134090/filename/134303.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anupam Sarkar, 2020. "Agricultural Mechanization in India: A Study on the Ownership and Investment in Farm Machinery by Cultivator Households across Agro-ecological Regions," Millennial Asia, , vol. 11(2), pages 160-186, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifpric:9780896293809_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.