IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/rleczz/s0147-9121(03)22010-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Children, Non-Discriminatory Provision Of Fringe Benefits, And Household Labor Market Decisions

In: Worker Well-Being and Public Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Mark C Berger
  • Dan A Black
  • Amitabh Chandra
  • Frank A Scott

Abstract

In the spirit of Polachek (1975) and the later work of Becker (1985) on the role of specialization within the family, we examine the relationship between fringe benefits and the division of labor within a married household. The provision of fringe benefits is complicated by their non-additive nature within the household, as well as IRS regulations that stipulate that they be offered in a non-discriminatory manner in order to maintain their tax-exempt status. We model family decisions within a framework in which one spouse specializes in childcare and as a result experiences a reduction in market productive capacity. Our model predicts that the forces toward specialization become stronger as the number of children increase, so that the spouse specializing in childcare will have some combination of lower wages, hours worked, and fringe benefits. We demonstrate that to the extent that labor markets are incomplete, the family is less likely to obtain health insurance from the employer of the spouse that specializes in childcare. Using data from the April 1993 CPS we find evidence consistent with our model.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark C Berger & Dan A Black & Amitabh Chandra & Frank A Scott, 2003. "Children, Non-Discriminatory Provision Of Fringe Benefits, And Household Labor Market Decisions," Research in Labor Economics, in: Worker Well-Being and Public Policy, pages 309-349, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:rleczz:s0147-9121(03)22010-0
    DOI: 10.1016/S0147-9121(03)22010-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0147-9121(03)22010-0/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0147-9121(03)22010-0/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0147-9121(03)22010-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rleczz:s0147-9121(03)22010-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.