IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/rhetzz/s0743-41542017000035a008.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

On the “Value Paradox” in Art Economics

In: Including a Symposium on the Historical Epistemology of Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron Weber

Abstract

What are the value theories used by art economists which can help define the field as a unique research program? We categorize the research program in art economics in Lakatosian terms and find that art economists share a value system around art which is that art contains value beyond that of exchange. This difference introduces a “paradox” of value to be addressed (either implicitly or explicitly) by the art economist in practice, in that mainstream economics assumes value is realized through exchange only. We then survey the literature and find evidence to support this value paradox claim. We also find that the art economics research program does not adequately address the potentiality of the state using art as instrumental value and introduce political economy to factor in a self-interested state using art production as a means to reproduce and ideally expand state legitimacy and power in society. We then give two examples of art-statism in practice to illustrate the possibility of art’s instrumentality.

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron Weber, 2017. "On the “Value Paradox” in Art Economics," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Including a Symposium on the Historical Epistemology of Economics, volume 35, pages 149-175, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:rhetzz:s0743-41542017000035a008
    DOI: 10.1108/S0743-41542017000035A008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0743-41542017000035A008/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0743-41542017000035A008/full/epub?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec&title=10.1108/S0743-41542017000035A008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0743-41542017000035A008/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/S0743-41542017000035A008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rhetzz:s0743-41542017000035a008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.