IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/rhetzz/s0743-41542016000034b006.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

“Good and Bad” (not “Good or Bad”): Albert O. Hirschman as a Behavioral Economist

In: Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap

Abstract

Albert O. Hirschman famously wrote against parsimony. He wanted to complicate economics. The locus of these complications was often individual behavior. This paper makes three arguments about such complications. The first is that the growing experimental evidence on individual behavior broadly supports many of Hirschman’s proposed complications. In particular, there is evidence of preference change under “reflection.” Second, I argue that there is experimental evidence of both “good and bad” preference change in market society. The third is that the policy of “nudging” would not sit well with Hirschman. “Nudging” is a return to the “parsimonious” instinct in economics; and it misses the real implications for policy of the insights from behavioral economics, which, of course, are more complex.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap, 2016. "“Good and Bad” (not “Good or Bad”): Albert O. Hirschman as a Behavioral Economist," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, volume 34, pages 161-174, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:rhetzz:s0743-41542016000034b006
    DOI: 10.1108/S0743-41542016000034B006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0743-41542016000034B006/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0743-41542016000034B006/full/epub?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec&title=10.1108/S0743-41542016000034B006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0743-41542016000034B006/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/S0743-41542016000034B006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rhetzz:s0743-41542016000034b006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.