IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/reanzz/s0190-1281(2012)0000032011.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Culture Trumps Reason: How Wall Street Manipulated the American Dream to Enrich Itself and Why The Victims of the Scam Were Put Out on the Street While the Perpetrators Were Rescued by the Government

In: Political Economy, Neoliberalism, and the Prehistoric Economies of Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Sidney M. Greenfield

Abstract

Purpose – This chapter asks whether the current economic crisis, precipitated by defaults in subprime mortgages, could have been postponed or perhaps even avoided? Design/methodology/approach – I begin by exploring an aspect of American culture that I call the moral philosophy of “just deserts.” The term “just deserts” is derived from the title of Alperovitz and Daly's (2008) book, Unjust Deserts: How the Rich Are Taking Our Common Inheritance and Why We Should Take It Back. To argue for greater equity in the distribution of wealth, the authors return to the 17th century writings of John Locke who helped establish the rules of property ownership that determine who is entitled to get what in the way of material goods. Locke's writings, infused with Protestant theology, became the basis of Western law and morality. Economic theory, on which the policies that led up to the latest crash and the responses to it, draws heavily on Locke's ideas. Findings – Holders of subprime mortgages who have lost their homes, according to this thinking that has become intrinsic to our culture, did not deserve to be given mortgages or to obtain homes. Paying these mortgages for them might have postponed or even prevented the crash and the collapse of the financial system. Rational as this seems, it was not even proposed, because it would have given people something they had not earned and hence were not believed to deserve. Research limitations/implications – The chapter is based on cultural and historical analysis. It cannot be tested empirically since this would require policy makers to change the assumptions on which its economic programs rest. Practical implications – The practical implications of the chapter are to stimulate examination and discussion of the cultural value of just deserts and the assumptions on which it is based. Originality/value – The reintroduction of culture and its assumptions into debates over public policy will improve understanding and enable us to avoid repeating social practices that have had negative effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Sidney M. Greenfield, 2012. "Culture Trumps Reason: How Wall Street Manipulated the American Dream to Enrich Itself and Why The Victims of the Scam Were Put Out on the Street While the Perpetrators Were Rescued by the Government," Research in Economic Anthropology, in: Political Economy, Neoliberalism, and the Prehistoric Economies of Latin America, pages 161-183, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:reanzz:s0190-1281(2012)0000032011
    DOI: 10.1108/S0190-1281(2012)0000032011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0190-1281(2012)0000032011/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0190-1281(2012)0000032011/full/epub?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec&title=10.1108/S0190-1281(2012)0000032011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0190-1281(2012)0000032011/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/S0190-1281(2012)0000032011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:reanzz:s0190-1281(2012)0000032011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.