IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/reanzz/s0190-1281(06)25012-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Choice and the Substantivist/Formalist Debate: A Formal Presentation of Three Substantivist Criticisms

In: Choice in Economic Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Justin A. Elardo
  • Al Campbell

Abstract

This chapter will address (only) one issue from the 1960s substantivist/formalist debate, the treatment of choice. The substantivists rejected the economic universality of the neoclassical axioms of choice under scarcity and the isolated and selfish nature of the choice process. A common formalist response was that their model based on these axioms could be modified to include whatever specific conditions economic choice was being made under. This chapter rejects that claim, based on a consideration not included in the debate. It is argued that the mathematical structure of the standard formal neoclassical model prevents it from incorporating the substantivist criticisms, and that to modify it in accord with these criticisms would necessarily result in a model that is outside the neoclassical approach to economic decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin A. Elardo & Al Campbell, 2006. "Choice and the Substantivist/Formalist Debate: A Formal Presentation of Three Substantivist Criticisms," Research in Economic Anthropology, in: Choice in Economic Contexts, pages 267-284, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:reanzz:s0190-1281(06)25012-1
    DOI: 10.1016/S0190-1281(06)25012-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0190-1281(06)25012-1/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0190-1281(06)25012-1/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0190-1281(06)25012-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:reanzz:s0190-1281(06)25012-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.