IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/csefzz/s1569-3759(2009)0000091013.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Doing away with inequality in loss of enjoyment of life

In: Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Damages Calculations: Transatlantic Dialogue

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Comandé

Abstract

The United States and European countries have for a long time affirmed non-pecuniary loss as a proper title of damages. On both sides of the Atlantic in the preceding decades, we have witnessed an escalation in the monetary amounts awarded for the non-pecuniary component of damages in cases of personal injury.1As a result of this escalation, the countries referred to have embarked on a shrill debate in trying to decipher a definition of their concrete notions of non-pecuniary damages2and on their awarding methods.3

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Comandé, 2009. "Doing away with inequality in loss of enjoyment of life," Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, in: Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Damages Calculations: Transatlantic Dialogue, pages 255-275, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:csefzz:s1569-3759(2009)0000091013
    DOI: 10.1108/S1569-3759(2009)0000091013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1569-3759(2009)0000091013/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1569-3759(2009)0000091013/full/epub?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec&title=10.1108/S1569-3759(2009)0000091013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1569-3759(2009)0000091013/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/S1569-3759(2009)0000091013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:csefzz:s1569-3759(2009)0000091013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.