IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/aecozz/s0731-9053(07)00001-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Selection bias in evaluating treatment effects: Some formal illustrations

In: Modelling and Evaluating Treatment Effects in Econometrics

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur S. Goldberger

Abstract

Regression analyses of compensatory educational programs have been criticized on the grounds that the pupils were not randomly selected. Specifically, it has been argued that a spurious deleterious effect of the treatment will be observed when the selection procedure systematically puts lower-ability students into the treatment group and higher-ability students into the control group. We evaluate this argument via a simple test score model: pretest score and posttest score are fallible measures of underlying true ability and the true treatment effect is zero. Posttest is regressed on pretest and a treatment dummy. The spurious effect arises when selection of subjects for treatment is explicit on the basis of true ability, but not when it is explicit on the basis of pretest score.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur S. Goldberger, 2008. "Selection bias in evaluating treatment effects: Some formal illustrations," Advances in Econometrics, in: Modelling and Evaluating Treatment Effects in Econometrics, pages 1-31, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:aecozz:s0731-9053(07)00001-1
    DOI: 10.1016/S0731-9053(07)00001-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0731-9053(07)00001-1/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0731-9053(07)00001-1/full/epub?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec&title=10.1016/S0731-9053(07)00001-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0731-9053(07)00001-1/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0731-9053(07)00001-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:aecozz:s0731-9053(07)00001-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.