IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/21563_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Gender, corruption perceptions, and political evaluations

In: Handbook on Gender and Corruption in Democracies

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory W. Saxton

Abstract

How do women’s representation and corruption perceptions affect evaluations of democratic institutions? I begin by providing an overview of the literature on gender stereotypes and corruption perceptions. A consistent finding is that citizens believe women politicians to be less corrupt than men, owing largely to women’s perceived risk aversion and political outsider status. Nevertheless, these gender stereotypes can be a double-edged sword. When women are implicated in or accused of corruption, they are punished more than men involved in similar acts. The second half of the chapter is an analysis of survey data from 18 Latin American countries showing that although citizens dislike corruption everywhere, it has the most negative effect on evaluations of democratic institutions in countries where women’s numeric representation in the legislature has increased in recent years. These findings suggest that if women are initially perceived as “political cleaners,” citizens political evaluations decline if expectations about corruption go unmet.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory W. Saxton, 2024. "Gender, corruption perceptions, and political evaluations," Chapters, in: Tiffany D. Barnes & Emily Beaulieu (ed.), Handbook on Gender and Corruption in Democracies, chapter 6, pages 65-76, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21563_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781803923246.00012
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21563_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.