IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/21563_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The effects of gender stereotypes on citizens’ perceptions of corruption: evidence from a conjoint survey experiment in Malaysia

In: Handbook on Gender and Corruption in Democracies

Author

Listed:
  • Holly E. Jansen

Abstract

Do gender stereotypes influence citizens’ perceptions of government corruption? Gender stereotypes of female politicians generally cast an image of higher ethical behavior when compared to their male counterparts. While recent research has established a causal relationship between women’s involvement in politics and reduced concerns about political corruption, the results are limited exclusively to a western sample-where there are more female politicians and generally more gender equity. As such, we cannot ascertain (1) whether the purported effects of gender stereotypes are more pronounced because non-western women are seen as even more ethical, honest, and trustworthy; and if so, (2) whether this difference is driven more by men or women-if not both. To examine this, I employed a conjoint survey experiment in Malaysia-home of one of the largest government corruption scandals globally to date (N=2000). The results suggest men are perceived to be more likely to engage in corruption than women at a higher rate than what the existing literature suggests-and that much of this finding is driven by male respondents.

Suggested Citation

  • Holly E. Jansen, 2024. "The effects of gender stereotypes on citizens’ perceptions of corruption: evidence from a conjoint survey experiment in Malaysia," Chapters, in: Tiffany D. Barnes & Emily Beaulieu (ed.), Handbook on Gender and Corruption in Democracies, chapter 21, pages 261-276, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21563_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781803923246.00031
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21563_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.