Author
Listed:
- David Gordon
- Patricia Warren
Abstract
The idea that the world's global financial centers could accommodate second purpose-built central business districts owes it genesis to London's Canary Wharf. Accessible by the Jubilee Underground Line and the Docklands Light Rail system (and after 2022, by London Crossrail), Canary Wharf is a 97-acre mixed-use redevelopment project located five miles east of the City of London atop London's great late 19th and early 20th century ship docks. Initially conceived of as a less-expensive high-rise "back-office" district for the City of London's height-constrained banks and financial institutions, Canary Wharf was developed in the late 1980s at the behest of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher by Olympia and York (O&Y), a Canadian real estate developer. After five years of planning and construction, Canary Wharf opened in 1991 amidst a severe economic downturn, sending O&Y into bankruptcy. As the market recovered, Canary Wharf prospered, and today, with more than 16M square feet of office space, 300 shops and restaurants, and a growing supply of housing, Canary Wharf is recognized around the world as a British icon. Canary Wharf demonstrates many of the advantages of mega-project development and some glaring disadvantages. In terms of advantages, Canary benefited from the streamlined planning and approval process put in place following the UK Government's establishment of the London Docklands Development Corporation (LDDC) in 1981. The fact that Canary Wharf was designated as an Enterprise Zone allowed O&Y to pass on property and business tax savings to potential tenants. Canary Wharf also benefitted from O&Y's having built similar speculative development projects in Toronto and New York City, and its eagerness to take on risk. On the disadvantage side, O&Y's predilection for risk-taking led it to significantly over-estimate office demand and to not prepare itself for foreseeable market downturns. Nor was O&Y adequately prepared for the slowness with which the UK Government would deliver on its promised public transport investments. Even as the London office market improved, Canary Wharf continued to suffer in the popular mind because of its insular character and the fact that it generated few public or financial benefits for the distressed communities that surrounded it. This reputation damage was not undone until Prime Minister Tony Blair's "New Labour" government ordered the LDDC to pursue social regeneration as vigorously as economic revitalization.
Suggested Citation
David Gordon & Patricia Warren, 2022.
"Canary Wharf's transformation from planning disaster to London's second business district,"
Chapters, in: John Landis (ed.), Megaprojects for Megacities, chapter 12, pages 382-406,
Edward Elgar Publishing.
Handle:
RePEc:elg:eechap:21439_12
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21439_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.