IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/21314_19.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Social acceptability and governance for public infrastructure projects

In: Research Handbook on the Governance of Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Maude Brunet
  • Sofiane Baba

Abstract

This chapter elucidates the links between governance frameworks for public infrastructure projects and their social acceptability. Building on recent literature on project studies, sustainability, and public policy, we uncover the relationships and blind spots between governance and social acceptability. More specifically, integrated impact assessments are explored as essential decision-making tools covering key factors of projects, i.e., environmental, societal, and governance. Specific institutional infrastructures of Quebec (Canada) exemplify the role of conducting such assessments for improved participative governance on public infrastructure projects and enhanced value of the constructed assets. This chapter’s discussion brings forward the benefits of governance frameworks aiming proactively at social acceptability with a win-win approach for the main stakeholders, such as the government (project owner), the local community, and civil society. Finally, important research avenues in this area are suggested in conclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Maude Brunet & Sofiane Baba, 2023. "Social acceptability and governance for public infrastructure projects," Chapters, in: Research Handbook on the Governance of Projects, chapter 19, pages 220-234, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21314_19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781802208078.00026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baba, Sofiane & Mercier, Naoko & Guesthier, Andrée-Anne, 2024. "Fostering the social license to operate: An integrative framework of organizational antecedents," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21314_19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.