IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/21180_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Methodological practices for enacting "strong" sociomateriality in qualitative IS research

In: Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Information Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Marko Niemimaa
  • Ulrike Schultze
  • Gijs van den Heuvel

Abstract

By redefining the relationship between the social and the technological in Information Systems research, the ontological stance referred to as “sociomateriality” has received considerable attention as well as critique, especially with regard to its application in empirical investigations. In this chapter, we explore how researchers can enact fully-relational or “strong” sociomateriality in qualitative empirical research. We develop and illustrate methodological practices to enact this form of sociomateriality in field studies. These practices are derived from Agential Realism, a philosophical position that is most frequently applied in IS research that adopts a fully relational ontology. The practices support authors in their efforts to conceptualize their phenomena of interest in relational terms, that is, as flows and forms of becoming. Further, drawing on published studies of IS phenomena in which Barad’s concepts have been applied, this chapter provides IS researchers with insights into how “strong” sociomaterial theorizing may be accomplished.

Suggested Citation

  • Marko Niemimaa & Ulrike Schultze & Gijs van den Heuvel, 2023. "Methodological practices for enacting "strong" sociomateriality in qualitative IS research," Chapters, in: Robert M. Davison (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Information Systems, chapter 11, pages 182-196, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21180_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781802205398.00017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21180_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.