Refuge in silos: how three of the largest MENA hosts address Syrian mass displacement in the absence of coordinated efforts and responses

The Syrian refugee crisis has brought forth diverse challenges for host countries, prominently Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon, each adopting distinct and fragmented approaches in managing this complex humanitarian issue. The lack of cohesive coordination among the three countries has led to discrepancies in service provision, resulting in unequal access to essential resources and rights for Syrian refugees. Moreover, these fragmented approaches have influenced the political discourse around refugees, shaping public perceptions and affecting their integration prospects within host communities. This chapter critically examines the disparate strategies employed by these nations and their consequential impacts on service provision, rights, and political discourse concerning Syrian refugees’ livelihoods, safety, integration, protection, and access to durable solutions. Through a comprehensive analysis of policy frameworks, service delivery mechanisms, and socio-political dynamics, this chapter sheds light on the multifaceted consequences of the fragmented approaches. It highlights the implications of such fragmented strategies on refugees’ safety, well-being, and prospects for durable solutions, emphasising the importance of collaborative and comprehensive approaches to address the multifaceted needs of Syrian refugees in the region. The comparative approach adopted in this chapter aims to highlight how each country managed the Syrian refugee influx in silos. Ultimately, this chapter aims to contribute to policy discussions and advocacy efforts that seek to improve refugee management strategies and promote a more unified and effective response to the Syrian refugee crisis.