IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/21117_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Peering into the black box: Using microsimulation methods to evaluate the gendered impact of taxes and transfers

In: A Research Agenda for Financial Resources within the Household

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Avram
  • Daria Popova

Abstract

Unitary models of household behaviour and decision-making remain the mainstream of academic research and official statistics of income and living standards, despite extensive evidence contradicting their assumptions. The main difficulty in moving beyond unitary models in empirical analysis has been how to deal with intra-household allocation issues satisfactorily. We show here how microsimulation models are a tool to go beyond assumptions of complete pooling and equal sharing when examining the gendered effects of tax/benefit policies. We discuss the principles and assumptions behind microsimulation models and highlight their strengths and weaknesses in dealing with intra-household allocation issues. After reviewing the limited literature using microsimulation to examine gender and/or intra-household inequality, we show how these models can be improved by combining them with information on income pooling from surveys to create more realistic scenarios of partial pooling in particular. We conclude by reviewing possible policy applications and suggesting future directions for research.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Avram & Daria Popova, 2024. "Peering into the black box: Using microsimulation methods to evaluate the gendered impact of taxes and transfers," Chapters, in: Fran Bennett & Silvia Avram & Siobhan Austen (ed.), A Research Agenda for Financial Resources within the Household, chapter 5, pages 79-93, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21117_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781802204001.00013
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21117_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.