IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/21117_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The gendered effects of joint assessment for couples claiming means-tested benefits

In: A Research Agenda for Financial Resources within the Household

Author

Listed:
  • Rita Griffiths

Abstract

In most means-tested benefit systems, a couple’s needs, income and assets are aggregated in order to assess eligibility and the amount of entitlement. This system, based on outdated notions of financial support obligations between ‘husbands and wives’ and contested assumptions about income pooling, means that individuals in couples who share the same household have no independent right to means-tested benefits. This matters because empirical research shows that assessing eligibility and entitlement for means-tested benefits using the couple as the assessment unit can potentially restrict individual access to a personal income – affecting women in particular. This chapter explores joint assessment in means-tested, working-age benefits and its gendered effects on the distribution of resources inside female/male couple households. The issues raised, particularly for women but for partners in couples generally, are explored chiefly through the lens of United Kingdom working-age benefits. Options for reform are discussed, together with suggestions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Rita Griffiths, 2024. "The gendered effects of joint assessment for couples claiming means-tested benefits," Chapters, in: Fran Bennett & Silvia Avram & Siobhan Austen (ed.), A Research Agenda for Financial Resources within the Household, chapter 14, pages 225-239, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21117_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781802204001.00024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21117_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.