IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/20848_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Deterritorializing intersectionality

In: Research Handbook on Feminist Political Thought

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Gambino

Abstract

This chapter critically engages Jennifer Nash’s claim that Black feminists must “deterritorialize” intersectionality. I suggest that Nash’s call to refuse Black feminism’s “proprietary relationship” to intersectionality is a vital contribution to a critical tradition that interrogates what Roderick Ferguson calls “the will to institutionality.” But the chapter also extends Nash’s arguments by insisting upon the ways that territory - an analytic deeply resonant with Native thinkers - poses complex political and conceptual challenges for Black feminists. I offer a reading of the territoriality of the university through the lens of the Morrill Act, showing that the university’s raced-gendered institutionality is an effect of settler colonial territorialization, and I argue that this lens ought to invite new ways of engaging Black and Native entanglements. Considering intersectionality through the lens of decolonized territory thus promotes precisely the “embrace of ideas of intimacy, proximity, vulnerability, and mutual regard” that Nash insists must guide Black feminists.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Gambino, 2024. "Deterritorializing intersectionality," Chapters, in: Mary Caputi & Patricia Moynagh (ed.), Research Handbook on Feminist Political Thought, chapter 11, pages 250-266, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20848_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781800889132.00020
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20848_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.