IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/20758_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Public opinion in the gray zone

In: Escalation Management in International Crises

Author

Listed:
  • Catarina P. Thomson

Abstract

Chapter 7 demonstrates that support for NATO has increased as Russia invades a neighbouring country - this is hardly surprising and thoroughly predicted by theories of public opinion in times of war. This chapter unpacks this headline, considering not just Russian and Chinese pre-war behavior but the underlying foreign policy attitudes of citizens across three different NATO member states. When gray zone tactics were the preferred mode of action for both Russia and China, were citizens in NATO countries such as the U.S., the UK and a former Soviet state like Lithuania in agreement as to how to respond to Russian and Chinese threats? Using data from the Gray Zone Security Survey on threat perceptions fielded in March 2021, the study finds that although NATO is generally perceived as the first port of call, the dynamics underlying such support vary between these three countries. Between one third to 40% of respondents have no clear preference for relying on a pivotal member of NATO such as the U.S., or an organization whose membership significantly overlaps with that of NATO (the EU), when they are at odds with China. Findings are discussed in the context of the current war in Ukraine.

Suggested Citation

  • Catarina P. Thomson, 2023. "Public opinion in the gray zone," Chapters, in: Jonathan Wilkenfeld & Egle E. Murauskaite (ed.), Escalation Management in International Crises, chapter 7, pages 174-200, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20758_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781800887329/9781800887329.00013.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Geography; Politics and Public Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20758_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.