IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/20687_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Manifesto for a better societal impact evaluation

In: Accountability in Academic Life

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Ochsner
  • Zoe Hope Bulaitis
  • Corina Balaban
  • Elena Castro-Martínez
  • Ondřej Daniel
  • Aldis Gedutis
  • Elea Giménez-Toledo
  • Marc Vanholsbeeck

Abstract

In this chapter, ENRESSH collaborators write a “Manifesto for a Better Societal Impact” Evaluation. In this, authors have extracted key principles based on some conclusions from the individual country reports which are broken down and/or extrapolated into generalisable findings drawing from the cross-national comparison. In doing so, this manifesto explores what scholars and policymakers from other European countries, and indeed from far wider international backgrounds, can learn from those countries’ experiences and the cross-national comparison. The chapter also goes beyond analysis, in providing a series of condensed recommendations for the evaluation of societal impact in the SSH with a special focus on how the evaluation can impact the work of academics in a positive way. In this collaborative task, we have sought to simultaneously respect disciplinary differences in knowledge production practices as well as in societal functions of research, while making this process as visible as possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Ochsner & Zoe Hope Bulaitis & Corina Balaban & Elena Castro-Martínez & Ondřej Daniel & Aldis Gedutis & Elea Giménez-Toledo & Marc Vanholsbeeck, 2023. "Manifesto for a better societal impact evaluation," Chapters, in: Michael Ochsner & Zoe H. Bulaitis (ed.), Accountability in Academic Life, chapter 2, pages 10-29, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20687_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781800885738.00009
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20687_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.