IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/20653_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Square pegs and round holes: Shrinking protections for unpaid interns under the Fair Labor Standards Act

In: Internships, Employability and the Search for Decent Work Experience

Author

Listed:
  • James J. Brudney

Abstract

There are roughly one million unpaid interns among the annual US university population. For over 60 years, legal standards specified that unpaid internships at for-profit employers had to be part of a prescribed educational or training course with no displacement of regular employees and no immediate employer advantage. The longstanding approach has been superseded since 2010 by a judicial balancing test, asking whether employer or unpaid intern is the “primary beneficiary†. This newly created test has made it easy for employers to justify unpaid internships. The asserted policy benefits derived from internships (resume enhancement, networking opportunities, training received) are realized to a greater degree by paid rather than unpaid interns. And any benefits are outweighed by lack of protection under anti-discrimination laws for these “non-employees†; the disparate impact of access to unpaid internships based on family wealth; and employers’ ability to substitute unpaid interns for regular employees receiving decent wages.

Suggested Citation

  • James J. Brudney, 2021. "Square pegs and round holes: Shrinking protections for unpaid interns under the Fair Labor Standards Act," Chapters, in: Andrew Stewart & Rosemary Owens & Niall O'Higgins & Anne Hewitt (ed.), Internships, Employability and the Search for Decent Work Experience, chapter 10, pages 163-188, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20653_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781800885035/9781800885035.00019.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20653_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.