IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/20574_33.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

An alternative to Alkire and Foster’s framework for measuring multidimensional deprivation

In: Research Handbook on Measuring Poverty and Deprivation

Author

Listed:
  • Prasanta K. Pattanaik
  • Yongsheng Xu

Abstract

This chapter presents an approach to measuring multidimensional deprivation, which is significantly different from the important approach of Alkire and Foster (2011) and Alkire et al. (2015) discussed in the previous chapter. This alternative approach, the basic features of which are to be found in earlier contributions of several writers including Tsui (2002), Bourguignon and Chakravarty (2003), Permanyer (2014, 2019), and Pattanaik and Xu (2018), starts with the intuition that an individual is deprived if and only if her well-being is “too low” and is based on the notions of an individual’s well-being function and a well-being benchmark to define what constitutes a “too low” level of individual well-being. We first present this alternative approach to the problem, then comment on the approach of Alkire and Foster (2011) and Alkire et al. (2015) and propose a variant of their approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Prasanta K. Pattanaik & Yongsheng Xu, 2023. "An alternative to Alkire and Foster’s framework for measuring multidimensional deprivation," Chapters, in: Jacques Silber (ed.), Research Handbook on Measuring Poverty and Deprivation, chapter 33, pages 355-367, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20574_33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781800883451/9781800883451.00047.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20574_33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.