IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/20315_18.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Examining gender-based inequalities in US public sector administrative positions over time

In: Handbook on Gender and Public Sector Employment

Author

Listed:
  • Valerie H. Hunt
  • Larra Rucker
  • Melissa A. Taylor
  • Brinck Kerr

Abstract

This chapter examines the presence of gender-based occupational segregation and pay equity among administrative workforces using Equal Employment Opportunity Commission data on US public sector employees. Occupational segregation is examined with glass walls (30 percent) and gender parity (50 percent) benchmarks. Pay equity is examined by comparing the percentage of female administrators in the top salary category with that of male administrators. Data are aggregated by agency policy missions and results presented by policy type (i.e., distributive, redistributive, and regulatory). Results demonstrate that both glass walls and pay equity are related to agency policy missions. Overall, glass walls remain strong with little progress in meeting parity. The highest rates of occupational segregation and pay inequity are found in regulatory agencies. The modest progress that has occurred remains inconsistent and is predominantly in redistributive agencies, which are often accompanied by broad social missions, low salaries, and limited discretion.

Suggested Citation

  • Valerie H. Hunt & Larra Rucker & Melissa A. Taylor & Brinck Kerr, 2023. "Examining gender-based inequalities in US public sector administrative positions over time," Chapters, in: Hazel Conley & Paula Koskinen Sandberg (ed.), Handbook on Gender and Public Sector Employment, chapter 18, pages 235-249, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20315_18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781800378230/9781800378230.00027.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20315_18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.