IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/20243_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Public sector reform and merit: principles, practices, and pushback

In: Handbook of Public Administration Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Althaus

Abstract

Merit is a bulwark of bureaucracy. Yet it involves myths and quite a bit of conceptual mess. For administrative reform to utilize the ideas and objectives of merit, it needs to be clear, precise, and purposeful in its deployment. This chapter surveys the latest scholarship on how merit principles have been applied in public sector practice and with what pushbacks to the concept as it is traditionally understood. Merit is often conflated with performance and can involve structural bias demanding attention. Many confuse the merit concept with seniority or the mere production of technical qualifications rather than capability. Views are divided as to whether merit is an ideal in itself that ought to define public service structure and practice, or part of a suite of tools designed to ensure the achievement of other important goals such as impartiality and equality. Merit applied without thought can result in grave unintended consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Althaus, 2023. "Public sector reform and merit: principles, practices, and pushback," Chapters, in: Shaun F. Goldfinch (ed.), Handbook of Public Administration Reform, chapter 2, pages 27-40, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20243_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781800376748.00006
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20243_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.