IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/20103_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Feminism

In: Research Handbook on the History of Political Thought

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Green

Abstract

While the OED defines feminism as “advocacy of equality of the sexes and the establishment of the political, social, and economic rights of the female sex; the movement associated with this,” here it is argued that a more encompassing definition of feminism, as a historical political tendency, is that it consists in opposition to masculinism. Masculinism is the doctrine that men legitimately govern women, while women do not legitimately exercise political authority over men. Aristotle is a classic source for the masculinist definition of the family as involving a natural relationship of ruler and subject; the subjects include women, children, and slaves. Masculinism comes into conflict with other accounts of political legitimacy such as aristocracy and meritocracy but is rationalized by masculinists by assertions that women are men’s moral and intellectual inferiors. Early feminists, intent on defending the right of queens and other aristocratic women to govern in limited circumstances, attacked these rationalizations of women’s exclusion from political power, claiming women’s moral equality with, and even superiority to, men. The rejection of theories of women’s inferiority undermined the legitimacy of the husband’s authority over his wife. Indeed, by the time of the French Revolution, women as men’s moral superiors led to Rousseau’s romantic, semi-egalitarian representation of marriage as combining men’s rule of his wife by reason with women’s virtuous rule of her husband’s passions. While seventeenth-century feminism concentrated on women’s subjection to men in the family, with the emergence of social contract as the accepted ground of political legitimacy, the focus of feminism changed, but continued to be opposition to masculinism, rejecting accounts of the social contract that imagined it to be a contract exclusively among men.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Green, 2024. "Feminism," Chapters, in: Cary J. Nederman & Guillaume Bogiaris (ed.), Research Handbook on the History of Political Thought, chapter 5, pages 53-61, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20103_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781800373808.00013
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20103_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.