IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/20089_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Conceptions of materiality in sustainability reporting frameworks: commonalities, differences and possibilities

In: Handbook of Accounting and Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart Cooper
  • Giovanna Michelon

Abstract

Over the last twenty years sustainability reporting standards and frameworks have developed and proliferated. In this chapter we provide an overview of a range of the most influential frameworks before focussing upon how they each conceptualise materiality. We do so as we believe that materiality is core to the practice of sustainability reporting. We conclude that materiality remains ambiguous and contested. The sustainability context is complex, and it is, therefore, problematic to seek simple solutions to the questions as to who are the key users and what is the material content for sustainability reporting. This is especially apparent given the interconnected and long-term nature of the sustainability issues that we face. We argue that it is the (stakeholder) accountability purpose, rather than the valuation and stewardship roles, that should be paramount in materiality determination processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart Cooper & Giovanna Michelon, 2022. "Conceptions of materiality in sustainability reporting frameworks: commonalities, differences and possibilities," Chapters, in: Carol A. Adams (ed.), Handbook of Accounting and Sustainability, chapter 4, pages 44-66, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20089_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781800373501/9781800373501.00010.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20089_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.