IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/19917_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

CRADAs: market failure and government failure?

In: Invention, Innovation and U.S. Federal Laboratories

Author

Listed:
  • .

Abstract

In this chapter the concluding proposition from Chapter 5, R&D _ Invention Disclosures _ Patent Applications, is reformulated and tested with another technology transfer mechanism, CRADAs (cooperative research and development agreements). There is not empirical support for the relationship, R&D _ Invention Disclosures _ CRADAs. The conclusion is that these empirical findings should not be interpreted as evidence of government failure. On the contrary. CRADA activity involves at least two research parties and external legislative initiatives. One research party is within the federal laboratory and the other is often a private sector firm, the latter being guided in part by economic conditions and the market for new technology.

Suggested Citation

  • ., 2020. "CRADAs: market failure and government failure?," Chapters, in: Invention, Innovation and U.S. Federal Laboratories, chapter 7, pages 86-92, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:19917_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781800370012.00013.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. da Silva Medina, Gabriel & Pokorny, Benno, 2022. "Agro-industrial development: Lessons from Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Wifo, 2021. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 1/2021," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 94(1), January.
    3. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Lane, Aaron M., 2023. "Why airdrop cryptocurrency tokens?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Chintapalli, Prashant & Tang, Christopher S., 2022. "The implications of crop minimum support price in the presence of myopic and strategic farmers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 336-349.
    5. Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Khan, Zaheer & Wood, Geoffrey & Knight, Gary, 2021. "COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 602-611.
    6. Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Franz Sinabell, 2021. "Der Beitrag der Konjunkturbelebung zur Transformation. Einordnung von Maßnahmen der Bundesländer," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 94(1), pages 67-78, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:19917_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.