IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/19695_24.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Meaning and purpose in academic research: researchers of the 1990s vs 2010s

In: Handbook of Meta-Research

Author

Listed:
  • Gerlese S. Åkerlind

Abstract

This chapter reports on six longitudinal case-studies of the meaning and purpose of research, as experienced by academics on research and teaching appointments in a research-intensive university in Australia. The case-studies are based on a comparison of interviews conducted with these academics in 1997, when neoliberal regulatory policies were first starting to impact research in Australian universities, and interviews with the same academics in 2012, by which time such policies were well entrenched. The aim of the chapter is to provide insight into the impact of the changing regulatory context on how research is being experienced within an academic career. A number of common changes were found in participants’ descriptions of their research and academic life between 1997 and 2012, including (a) references to much higher administrative burdens; (b) expressions of cynicism, stress and fatigue, in particular related to reduced time and increased pressure for research; and (c) less holistic experiences of research, with distinctions drawn between institutionally-required research that is needed to meet university performance expectations and interest-inspired research that is felt to be important and interesting in its own right. In 1997, participants described all of the research they engaged in in a consistent way. But by 2012, they described engaging in different types of research for different purposes. All participants described interest-inspired research, which was experienced as an act of discovery or contribution that enhanced personal understanding and disciplinary/social change. But some explicitly contrasted this with institutionally required research, which was experienced as an academic duty intended to produce concrete outcomes, such as published papers and research grants required to meet institutional performance measures. These findings indicate that conflicts between academic and neoliberal values in research are not simply disappearing over time, despite long-term acculturation to neoliberal values. Such conflicts continue to impact academics’ psychological well-being, and there is evidence that academics’ experience of research may be becoming more fragmented.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerlese S. Åkerlind, 2024. "Meaning and purpose in academic research: researchers of the 1990s vs 2010s," Chapters, in: Alis Oancea & Gemma E. Derrick & Nuzha Nuseibeh & Xin Xu (ed.), Handbook of Meta-Research, chapter 24, pages 309-321, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:19695_24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781839105722.00033
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:19695_24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.