IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/19544_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Statist objections to a cosmopolitan minimum de-commodification of labour

In: Global Justice, Markets and Domination

Author

Listed:
  • .

Abstract

In the fourth chapter I defend the account of global justice based on MDL from four powerful objections that are usually raised against classic theories of global justice. The first one is the so called ‘compatriot priority principle’: why should not we give priority to co-nationals in the process of labour de-commodification? The second objection pertains to the so-called ‘coercion view’, which maintains that the absence of coercive institutions at the global level implies that a global redistribution of resources can only be required for humanitarian reasons. The third objection is why shall we linger on judging and criticizing a world order that will never meet the normative standards that we use in our analysis. The fourth objection is the infeasibility objection, and it maintains that we lack both the economic resources and the means for targeting individuals with respect to MDL.

Suggested Citation

  • ., 2020. "Statist objections to a cosmopolitan minimum de-commodification of labour," Chapters, in: Global Justice, Markets and Domination, chapter 4, pages 132-158, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:19544_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781839102554.00009.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:19544_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.