IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/18769_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Understanding Chinas low-carbon transitions in theory

In: Conducting and Financing Low-carbon Transitions in China

Author

Listed:
  • .

Abstract

Learning from China requires a better understanding of how the state actors have tackled mitigation and low carbon transitions (MLCT) and the outcomes than what is currently available. It necessitates an analysis of governing strategies and practices. This chapter justifies, explains, and operationalizes the governmentality perspective. It first reviews three existing interpretative models of China's MLCT performance, focusing respectively on policy, politics, and governance, and their deficiencies. It then introduces the perspective of carbon governmentality, conceptualizing MLCT as an outcome of conducting the conduct of the governed through the art of carbon government aimed to promote MLCT. Key terms in the governmentality perspective and its analytical merits are explained. The governmentality perspective is finally operationalized by adapting Mitchell Dean's 'analytics of government'. An analytical framework is formulated for investigating the carbon governmentalities in terms of political rationalities and the governing techniques and technologies for MLCT.

Suggested Citation

  • ., 2021. "Understanding Chinas low-carbon transitions in theory," Chapters, in: Le-Yin Zhang (ed.), Conducting and Financing Low-carbon Transitions in China, chapter 2, pages 11-36, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:18769_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781788977388/9781788977388.00009.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Haining & Cheng, Zhiming, 2022. "Kids eat free: School feeding and family spending on education," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 196-212.
    2. Cowden, Birton & Tang, Jintong, 2022. "Institutional entrepreneurial orientation: Beyond setting the rules of the game for blockchain technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife M. & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Springer, Cecilia Han, 2022. "China’s withdrawal from overseas coal in context," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:18769_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.