IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/18768_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Evidence on the impact of labor provisions in preferential trade agreements

In: Handbook on Globalisation and Labour Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Damian Raess

Abstract

In recent decades, and especially over the past 10-15 years, trade-labor linkages have become a prominent feature of public approaches to protecting labor rights under globalization. This chapter reviews the emerging literature on the effect of the introduction of labor provisions (LPs) in preferential trade agreements (PTAs). Qualitative and quantitative studies generally find that while LPs in PTAs have no impact on labor standards or exports from developing to developed countries, they tend to strengthen the labor administration and inspection. However, impact studies still suffer from data constraints and imprecise approaches to defining or coding LPs. Thanks to work to create comprehensive and fine-grained datasets on LPs in PTAs, this is changing. The emerging findings from select studies using the new data sources suggest more positive effects on labor standards and developing country exports than prior scholarship suggests. The datasets hold the promise of new and steady accumulation of knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Damian Raess, 2022. "Evidence on the impact of labor provisions in preferential trade agreements," Chapters, in: Handbook on Globalisation and Labour Standards, chapter 12, pages 226-243, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:18768_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781788977364/9781788977364.00018.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hoekman, Bernard & Santi, Filippo & Shingal, Anirudh, 2023. "Trade effects of non-economic provisions in trade agreements," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:18768_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.