Author
Abstract
In Bluestone and Harrison gave the disease with no name a name: deindustrialization. The concept, following closely community development principles, arose out of the Great Reindustrialization Debate which had been raging through the seventies and which would continue well into the nineties. The debate revolved around our third competitive hierarchy: global comparative advantage/free trade. In many ways the debate attempted to reconcile place-based economic development with a capitalism whose capital was mobile and whose firms, sectors and industries seemed locked into the profit cycle. Foreign competition and the rise and fall of sunrise and sunset industries demanded state and sub-state policy response. The incredible and diverse strategies (ranging from clusters, small business, entrepreneur, innovation and knowledge-based economics, and corporate strategy and others) that emerged from the debate transformed economic development and developed its agenda for contemporary economic development. The long-neglected jurisdictional economic base was finally getting some attention it needed so badly. The chapter takes a final look at the federal government, reviewing the Clinton’s administration’s awkward dance with community development, and the development of new approaches such as New Market Tax Credit. It also looks again at regional change and the arrival of the New South that demonstrates the reality of a “vanishing Sunbelt†as each region moves along its own economic development path. Strategies such as these pushed the States into State and Sub-State economic development. A major characteristic of contemporary economic development is the powerful, often lead role of the state in sub-national economic development. Indeed, one could say we have developed into a 50-state American economic development system. It hasn’t been all good, some would say. The states have brought with them a steroidal “let’s make a deal†approach to attraction and recruitment, along with arguably their most commonly used economic development strategy: casino gambling (along with other forms). Using Massachusetts as a case study, this chapter demonstrates how states responded by innovation and sheer politics to form hybrid economic/community development policy systems. With new approaches to capital formation, reliance on distressed geographic targeting, pioneering innovation with Centers for Excellence, skills-based workforce systems and support for sunrise sectors, Massachusetts had it all in place by 1985. The final and concluding theme is Big Sort population mobility which, when combined with attitude and culture change of generational cohorts, has created more or less homogenous policy systems composed of a majority of like-minded and economically similar voters that has frozen in place a polarized, politicized new world of economic development. Big Sort population mobility has produced the underlying basis for our contemporary economic development Blue State/Red State politicization. Exploring the dynamics of each of those topics, the chapter uses the example of San Francisco’s hyper-pluralism as a Weberian ideal type to expose the elements that have politicized contemporary economic development.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:17036_19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.